What Do You Think of Trump?

from Alan Langstaff

Kairos Ministries

trump

‘What do you think of Donald Trump?’ was the question Benjamin, my 10-year-old grandson, asked me while I was driving him home from Homeschool Co-op he and his siblings attend. It seems that Benjamin and his classmates were discussing Trump at school. Before answering this question, let me give you some answers others have given in regard to Donald Trump.

TRUMP IS A ‘RACCOON REMOVER’
Suppose you have been on vacation for two weeks. You come home to find your basement is infested with raccoons: hundreds of rabid, messy, mean tempered raccoons. Of course, you want them gone immediately, so you hire a pro. You don’t care if the guy smells. You don’t care how many times he has been married. You don’t care if the guy is dirty all over. You only care that he is a pro at raccoon removal. You want your problem fixed and he is…

View original post 1,583 more words

What’s so important about Israel?

Christians are divided these days about Israel. Catholics and Lutherans are repenting for past anti-Semitism. Presbyterians and Methodists are anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian and don’t give Israel the modern nation any “special status” whatsoever in God’s purview. Dispensationalists look for the Church to either be raptured (if faithful) or fooled into following the anti-Christ (if unfaithful/apostate)…and then Israel is supposed to be back on God’s radar screen once again. Charismatics want to BE “Israel” — seemingly a “special blessing” is attached — and Evangelicals want to argue about Israel’s future, her “right” to her land, whether she can still be “saved” or not (without consciously and deliberately “accepting Jesus as God and Savior”)…and on it goes. Some Messianic Jewish believers want to “trust Jesus” AND “keep the Law”, some One New Man followers are advocating freedom to eat bacon sandwiches, etc. So how can the same Scripture yield so many points of view on such a seemingly limited subject?

First of all, we need to ask ourselves how we are supposed to view Scripture as a whole. As my blog would seem to indicate, I am biased in the direction of the early Church father St. Irenaeus, who upheld a “salvation-history” orientation to his theology, as being the primal, apostolic worldview of Scripture. That meant, among other things, that “history” was not just a “neutral” template on which God or people could write out or act out their personal preferences or agendas (whether good or bad); rather, it was PART AND PARCEL of God’s own activity to bring about His redemptive plan for humankind. Thus, from Genesis to Revelation, Scripture had a covenantal “story” to it, involving creation, fall, judgment, second chances, God’s covenant with Abraham, the Exodus, the Law, the Conquest, judges, kings, a Temple, an exile (actually, two!), a return, prophetic hopes of a coming Messiah and Kingdom, the Incarnation, Atonement, Resurrection, Ascension, Pentecost, apostolic Church, New Testament instruction, a worldwide preaching mission to the nations, a prophesied time of apostasy/”falling away”, Israel’s physical and spiritual restoration, the return of Christ, the Kingdom on earth during a time of the “restoration of all things”, final judgment, and an eternal New Heavens and New Earth. — This is a straight-forward, face-value reading of Scripture and its own viewpoint of salvation-history, including the role of Israel in the mix. Surely then, our slant on how to view Israel should develop out of that biblical theological viewpoint?

If it does, then — if we compare Scripture with a survey of our own “place” in the unfolding of history today — we surely find that we are at the point of the “apostasy” of parts of the Church, following the outreach to every last tongue, tribe and nation, and the physical restoration of the nation of Israel (1948) and the city of Jerusalem (1967). What is yet lacking is Israel’s last days spiritual “awakening” to her Messiah (Rom. 11:26, etc.) — and the faithful Church’s “One New Man” union with her under Messiah Jesus Himself. This “return to Jewish roots” is not just historical and spiritual, but also very much theological: we need to let the old “biblical-classical synthesis” of the Western Church break down, and rethink and rework biblical Christianity in a less “Greek” orientation, as St. Irenaeus originally did in his “‘Against Heresies” (5 volumes) and “Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching”. Modern presentations of this type of theological understanding can be found in J. C. K. von Hofmann (“Interpreting the Bible”), Oscar Cullmann (especially in his “The Early Church”, “Christ and Time”, and “Salvation in History”), George Eldon Ladd (“The Blessed Hope”, “Crucial Questions About the Kingdom of God”, “The Pattern of New Testament Truth”, “I Believe in the Resurrection”, and “The Last Things”), Robert Saucy (“The Case for Progressive Dispensationalism”), and Dan Juster and Asher Intrater (“Israel, the Church, and the Last Days”).

Of course, real life is never as simple as it looks to be on paper: to reorient the life and thinking and doing of the churches requires “repentance” from past sins and mistakes, and “reform” of past biases, wrongful theological turns, denominational miscommittals, etc. Those who “see” these past sins and mistakes can perhaps be looked to to make headway in this new/old “One New Man” convergence, understanding of salvation-history, prayer for the rebirth of Israel at the end of the age, etc., kind of direction. But those who will oppose it will also be many — and as history itself keeps looming closer and closer to a climax, “making room for Israel” could easily become a watershed for the churches, as to whether they do really trust their JEWISH Savior and Messiah, or prefer to gnostically de-ethnitize and de-historicize Him, in order to cling to a Gentile pre-eminence instead. As Emil Brunner once put it, we tend to be “scandalized” whenever God decides to be “particular” in what He chooses — or chooses NOT to choose! I think it was e. e. cummings, the modern poet of a generation ago, who said, “How odd of God to choose the Jews.” Just so that God’s “oddities” don’t become our own “offenses” — or practical or theological “stumbling-blocks” in the days to come!

O Lord, give us a heart after Your own heart, to not be upset by what You Yourself deem to be “good”, whether we fully “understand” Your priorities right away or not. In Jesus’ own precious name we pray: Amen.

— Lance Wonders

What if God…?

What if God decided He was going to restore Israel now, and put Gentiles in a subordinate place in the life of the Body of His Son?  Would we be offended?  Would we reject that decision?  Would we embrace it, seek after it, actively be a part of it?  What if that meant, too, that He would start changing the Church, to become more “Hebraic” and less “Greek”?  Would we be okay with that?  Really?  What if THIS WERE THE YEAR that He decided to start doing that in earnest?  What if He decided to only pour out His Spirit from now on, in any truly significant ways, with that change and “convergence” in mind?  What if He resolved to keep doing this until His Son’s return?

What if…?

Lance Wonders